4.2 Th e basic single-cycle MIPS implementation in Figure 4.2 can only implement some instructions..

4.2 Th e basic single-cycle MIPS implementation in Figure 4.2 can only implement some instructions. New instructions can be added to an existing Instruction Set Architecture (ISA), but the decision whether or not to do that depends, among other things, on the cost and complexity the proposed addition introduces into the processor datapath and control. Th e fi rst three problems in this exercise refer to the new instruction: Instruction: LWI Rt,Rd(Rs) Interpretation: Reg[Rt] = Mem[Reg[Rd]+Reg[Rs]] 4.2.1 [10] Which existing blocks (if any) can be used for this instruction? 4.2.2 [10] Which new

View complete question 4.2 Th e basic single-cycle MIPS implementation in Figure 4.2 can only implement some instructions. New instructions can be added to an existing Instruction Set Architecture (ISA), but the decision whether or not to do that depends, among other things, on the cost and complexity the proposed addition introduces into the processor datapath and control. Th e fi rst three problems in this exercise refer to the new instruction: Instruction: LWI Rt,Rd(Rs) Interpretation: Reg[Rt] = Mem[Reg[Rd]+Reg[Rs]] 4.2.1 [10] Which existing blocks (if any) can be used for this instruction? 4.2.2 [10] Which new functional blocks (if any) do we need for this instruction? 4.2.3 [10] What new signals do we need (if any) from the control unit to support this instruction? 4.3 When processor designers consider a possible improvement to the processor datapath, the decision usually depends on the cost/performance trade-off . In the following three problems, assume that we are starting with a datapath from Figure 4.2, where I-Mem, Add, Mux, ALU, Regs, D-Mem, and Control blocks have latencies of 400 ps, 100 ps, 30 ps, 120 ps, 200 ps, 350 ps, and 100 ps, respectively, and costs of 1000, 30, 10, 100, 200, 2000, and 500, respectively. Consider the addition of a multiplier to the ALU. Th is addition will add 300 ps to the latency of the ALU and will add a cost of 600 to the ALU. Th e result will be 5% fewer instructions executed since we will no longer need to emulate the MUL instruction. 4.3.1 [10] What is the clock cycle time with and without this improvement? 4.3.2 [10] What is the speedup achieved by adding this improvement? 4.3.3 [10] Compare the cost/performance ratio with and without this improvement. Figure 2

View less