Miranda Warnings

 Please answer the following questions.  Each response should be at least two paragraphs.  If outside resources are used, please use APA formatting to document the source.  Type the question first and then provide the answer.
 
1. On October 28, 2016, a complaint was filed alleging that Hazel burglarized a Walgreens Store in Lincoln, Nebraska (the state case). Hazel got an attorney. On January 19, 2017, Hazel was indicted in federal court for stealing from ATM machines (the federal case). On the morning of February 1, 2017, Hazel was processed out of the county jail and transported to the federal building for her arraignment in the federal case. At the federal building, Hazel was greeted by FBI Special Agent Saad for an interview. Saad gave Hazel Miranda warnings; she signed a waiver form and made incriminating statements. Hazel tried to suppress her statements, claiming that Agent Saad could not question her without an attorney on the federal case because she had an attorney for the state case. You are the judge. Will you suppress Hazels statements?  Why or why not?  Defend your answer.
2. During a custodial interrogation about a shooting, the officers read the suspect Miranda warnings and he competently waived his rights. Officer Smith then said to the suspect that this was his last chance to distance himself from the crime by admitting that he was present during the shooting. The officers said it was clear the suspect was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. One officer said, The district attorney is going to see this. The judge is going to see this, and ultimately the jury is going to see this, and when they hear you spinning this tale, youre not helping yourself. So, tell the story of what happened out there. If you didnt pull the trigger, nows the chance for you to tell your story. The suspect confessed, and later moved to suppress his confession, claiming coercion. The government said the confession was voluntary. Which side will win?  Defend your answer.