Pharmacologists in the nursing

Read the integrative research review article by Knisely, Carpenter, and Ah “Pharmacologists in the nursing literature: An integrative review.” Then complete a four-five page analysis and critique paper, 750-1000 words. In this critique you will complete the Synopsis, Credibility, and Clinical Significance components from pages 409-413 of your textbook, Appendix D: “Completed Appraisal: Conclusions of an Integrative Research Review.”
Title your page with the following heading:•Learning Activity #3: Your Name and the Date.•Appraisal: Conclusions of an Integrative Research Review.•Citation: Knisely, M. R., Carpenter, J. S., & Ah, D. V. (2014). Pharmacogenomics in the nursing literature: An integrative review. Nursing Outlook, 62(4), 285-296. doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2014.03.004.
A. Synopsis:1.How many persons were involved in conducting the review?.2.What topic or question did the integrative research review address?.3.How were potential research reports identified?.4.What determined if a study was included in the analysis?.5.How many studies were included in the review?.6.What research designs were used in the selected research studies?.7.What were the consistent and important across-studies conclusions?.
B. Credibility:8.Was the topic clearly defined? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___.9.Was the search for studies and other evidence comprehensive and unbiased? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___.10.Was the screening of citations for inclusion based on explicit criteria? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___.11.Were the included studies assessed for quality? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___.12.Were the design characteristics and the findings of the studies displayed or discussed in sufficient detail? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___.13.Was there truly an integration (synthesis) of findings – not merely reporting of findings from each study individually? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___.14.If different findings were found between studies, did the reviewers explore why differences in findings might have occurred? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___.15.Did the reviewers distinguish between conclusions based on consistent findings from a sufficient number of studies and those based on inferior evidence? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___.16.Which conclusions were supported by consistent findings from two or more studies? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___.17.Are the conclusions credible? All ___ Some ___ No ___.
C. Clinical Significance:18.Across studies, is the size of the treatment or the strength of the association found or the meaningfulness of qualitative findings strong enough to make a difference in patient outcomes or experiences of care? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___.19.Are the conclusions relevant to the care the nurses give? Yes ___ No ___ Not clear ___.20.Are the conclusions clinically significant? Some ___ No ___.
D. Conclusion:
21. Conclude the paper with your thoughts about using integrative research reviews to find evidence about clinical practice problems. Is this approach a practice that you could use in your own clinical practice setting?

“Custom Writers 24/7” We have the Best Writers in the industry