please, make the paper better with the Supervisor’s comments on each section. go

please, make the paper better with the Supervisor’s comments on each section. go through the entire paper so you know how to make it better. also construct the paper in a logical manner so that everything fits and adjust or edit unnecessary details based on the feedback on the sides of the paper. Please fix the Introduction properly. and in every chapter, add what the chapter will be about. The case study chapter really needs to be reworked on.I will pay for 6pages ( 1650 words) now, but when you start the paper and there is need for more to make it better and logical, let me know then I can pay for additional pages. if you delete a detail you think its unnecessary please don’t forget to adjust it in the reference list. i.e if u delete text or paragraphs I cited. Please, also add page numbers after citing a text. add page number at the bottom of each paper and please fix the table of content correctly.Please, make the Paper’s argument obvious, work on the , methodology and theoretical framework as well use the supervisors guide. and help adjust repitations just as the lecturer as suggested. And input Your analysis.please, If you need any assistance let me know, and let me know how the paper is going because I need to give my supervisor update on the paper. You see if u can use some of the sources provided in the reference list.Also, here is additional feedback from the supervisor.1. Note that ethically you are supposed to properly reference each and every thought that comes from a source other than yourself. I still come across whole paragraphs that are lifted from other sources (note that it is not enough to just rephrase other’s ideas, you need to clearly show which ideas/thoughts come from sources other than you and which are your own). This is plagiarism, because I cannot distinguish your words from other authors. Rule of thumb: every idea you take from elsewhere add the reference at the end of the sentence NOT at the end of a whole paragraph, this should also give you an indication of how much work you still have to do to connect different thoughts, add your own voice and analysis.Please read about plagiarism here: https://www.tlu.ee/en/students-about-ethics-and-plagiarismIf you have any questions let me know.2. research problem is not presented convincingly: you need to still work on connecting your literature review, theoretical framework and then your own ideas (=analysis) and showing that this led to your research question. I see disconnected thoughts taken from others’ work, you need to work on organising arguments from previous work, then also saying why certain arguments allow you to do the work you have planned.3. there is a lack of your own analysis, I have said this before, so please consult this resource:https://www.audreyalejandro.com/blog—the-methodological-artist/what-is-analysis-some-tips-to-become-more-analyticalAnd try to demonstrate your own analysis, thoughts and input for the next time. –> everything in the case study section demonstrates snippets from other sources, I don’t see how you apply NPE, discourse analysis to your case. You need to seriously rewrite this part and also tease out which aspects, patterns you will focus on when you look at discourses. It was really difficult to engage with your work, you need to be more transparent. You cannot just put a reference at the end of the paragraph when everything in that paragraph is taken from that source, that is misleading.