POSITIVIST-INTERPRETIVIST DEBATE IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES /COMPARING AND CONTRASTING EXAMPLES OF RESEARCH FROM EACH TRADITION.

positivist-interpretivist debate in the social sciences /comparing and contrasting examples of research from each tradition.PURPOSEThe purpose of this assignment is for students to comprehend the history and claims of thepositivist-interpretivist debate in the social sciences, and to develop the ability to identify,compare, and analyze examples of positivist and interpretivist research in social psychology.INSTRUCTIONSIn this paper, you will engage and assess the positivist-interpretivist debate in the social sciencesby comparing and contrasting examples of research from each tradition.Develop an introduction for your paper (approx. 1 pg.). In your introduction, outline for thereader what the paper is about and indicate the various sections of the analysis to come. TIP:Develop your introduction last—you dont know what youre introducing until youve writtenthe rest of your paper.Develop a discussion of the positivist-interpretivist debate in your paper (approx. 2 pp.).Read and become familiar with the positivist-interpretivist debate Prus discusses in the coursetext and we have discussed in class. In general terms, Pruss entire text considers aspects of thedebate, but you will find Chapter 1 (entire chapter) and Chapter 7 (pp. 203-216) especiallyuseful. Some questions to consider in writing this section include: What is the positivistinterpretivistdebate? How does each approach understand/conceptualize social reality? What arethe practices and premises that each camp uses in the study of group life? What are theadvantages and limitations of each approach?Select one example of a positivist social psychological study and one example of aninterpretivist social psychological study from a scholarly journal, and then overview eacharticle for the reader (approx. 1 pg.). Ideally these articles will consider the same general topic(e.g., gender, education, deviance). TIP: A useful source for positivist (and sometimesinterpretivist) studies is the journal Social Psychology Quarterly. And a useful source forinterpretivist studies is the journal Symbolic Interaction. Whichever articles you choose, theyshould be available online through your library account. Some questions to consider in writingthis section include: What are the research questions/problems each article considers? Whattheoretical perspective and methodological orientation does each use? What are the key findingsof each study?Compare and contrast the studies in terms of their assumptions, methods, and findings(approx. 2-4 pp.). Be as detailed and precise as possible. Indicate and discuss thepositivist/interpretivist elements of each article. The course text will be useful in identifyingthese elements and their connections.2Discuss and assess the advantages and disadvantages of each approach in understandingthe particular social phenomenon under investigation in each article (approx 2-4 pp.).Again, the course text suggests themes to think about, but you can also discuss possibilities withyour TA.Develop a conclusion (approx. 1pg.). Highlight what youve learned in doing the assignment.Indicate the elements that proved to be the most challenging.PRESENTATIONThe paper should be approximately 10 pages long, double-spaced and with 1 inch margins. UseTimes New Roman 12 point font and number your pages. The paper should also have a propertitle page, including your name, student number, and TA.At the end of your paper, include references or work cited.Pay particular attention to your writing style, spelling, and grammar since these will be takeninto consideration in the marking.EVALUATIONThe analysis will be marked according to the following criteria: Does the analysis demonstrate afull and accurate understanding of the positivist-interpretivist debate in the social sciences? Dothe articles represent instances of positivist and interpretivist research? Are the articles wellsummarized, compared, contrasted, and assessed according the instructions? Does the analysisincorporate references to relevant the lectures and readings? Are the connections relevant, wellestablished,and well-argued? Have all of the instructions regarding presentation been observed?Exceptional reports will receive between 90 and 100%. Above average reports will receivebetween 80 and 89%. Satisfactory or fully competent papers will receive between 70 and 79%.Less than satisfactory or marginal reports will receive between 50 and 69%. Unacceptable paperswill receive a failing grade.

“Custom Writers 24/7” We have the Best Writers in the industry