Scientific knowledge is not static: reviews help scientists to understand how kn

Scientific knowledge is not static: reviews help scientists to understand how knowledge in a particular field is changing and developing over time. There is a significant output of scientific publications – literature reviews save time for the scientific community. Literature reviews and journal articles can lead to new scientific insights and highlight gaps, conflicting results and under-examined areas of research.Assignment (complete steps 1-4)1. Identify a SWE topic to complete a literature review. (A literature review is an overview of the previously published works on a specific topic.)2. Find a minimum of 2-3 pieces of peer reviewed academic literature or case studies. Turn in a separate document.3. Write a minimum 2 page paper, single spaced 12 pt font, Times New Roman in APA format. Do not use excessive spacing, charts, figures or graphs. You may reference those in an appendix. References should be APA 7th Edition.Assignment Guidelines (no example provided)How to write a chapter analysis1. Problem formulation – Which topic is being examined and why? What aspects will be included/excluded? Define your scope2. Literature search – Identifying relevant research3. Critical analysis – Criticize the experts; identify conflicting evidence, assumptions, errors and misconceptions.4. Evaluation – Reflect on the literature and formulate a personal, well thought-out response.RubricChapter Analysis (2)Chapter Analysis (2)Criteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterionSummary30 ptsFull MarksShows superior knowledge of the issues, key problems, and findings of the research article. Excellent grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax15 ptsPartialShows little understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Summary is poorly constructed. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax needs significant improvement0 ptsNo MarksNo Summary30 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection30 ptsFull MarksWrite your personal thoughts about the article in terms of the findings. Do you agree or not agree? Base your decision on specific data or facts to support your analysis and conclusions. Include additional thoughts on recommendations, solutions, and/or plans of action there were provided by the authors. What are your overall thoughts on the article and your rationale.15 ptsPartialEffective recommendations and/or plans of action not provided. Specific data or facts necessary to support the analysis and conclusions was not provided.0 ptsNo MarksNo reflection30 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle15 ptsFull MarksArticle is from a reputable journal or peer reviewed conference paper0 ptsNo MarksArticle does not meet the criteria15 ptsTotal Points: 75