Strategy Implementation

File RestrictionsFile name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )File size limit: 200 MBFile types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7zRUBRICARTICULATION OF RESPONSE (CLARITY, ORGANIZATION, MECHANICS):NOT EVIDENTThe candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides weak articulation of response.COMPETENTThe candidate provides adequate articulation of response.A1:IDENTIFICATION OF KEY STAKEHOLDERSNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not identify any key stakeholders.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate identifies 1–4 key stakeholders.COMPETENTThe candidate identifies 5 key stakeholders.A1A:IMPACTS ON STAKEHOLDERSNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not discuss the impacts of the acquisition on the key stakeholders identified in A1.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient detail, of the impacts of the acquisition on the key stakeholders identified in A1.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of the impacts of the acquisition on the key stakeholders identified in A1.A2:BARRIERS FOR CHANGENOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not identify any barriers for change.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate identifies 1–2 barriers for change.COMPETENTThe candidate identifies 3 barriers for change.A2A:CRITERIA FOR PRIORITIZING BARRIERSNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the criteria the candidate would use to prioritize the barriers identified in A2.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient detail, of the criteria the candidate would use to prioritize the barriers identified in A2.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of the criteria the candidate would use to prioritize the barriers identified in A2.A2AI:PRIORITIZED BARRIERSNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not appropriately prioritize the identified barriers according to the criteria in A2a.APPROACHING COMPETENCENot applicable.COMPETENTThe candidate appropriately prioritizes the identified barriers according to the criteria in A2a.A2B:KEY LEVERAGE POINTSNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical explanation of 3 key leverage points for initiating change.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with insufficient detail, of 3 key leverage points for initiating change.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with sufficient detail, of 3 key leverage points for initiating change.B1:APPROACHES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE TEAM-BASED MODELNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide an appropriate description of 2 approaches for implementing the new team-based model of care delivery.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides an appropriate description of 2 approaches, with insufficient detail, for implementing the new team-based model of care delivery.COMPETENTThe candidate provides an appropriate description of 2 approaches, with sufficient detail, for implementing the new team-based model of care delivery.B1A:STRENGTHS OF THE APPROACHESNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the strengths of each of the 2 approaches described in B1.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient detail, of the strengths of each of the 2 approaches described in B1.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of the strengths of each of the 2 approaches described in B1.B1B:WEAKNESSES OF THE APPROACHESNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the weaknesses of each of the 2 approaches described in B1.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient detail, of the weaknesses of each of the 2 approaches described in B1.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of the weaknesses of each of the 2 approaches described in B1.B1C:RECOMMENDED APPROACHNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide an appropriate recommendation of 1 of the 2 approaches in part B1 based on the strengths and weaknesses of each one.APPROACHING COMPETENCENot applicable.COMPETENTThe candidate provides an appropriate recommendation of 1 of the 2 approaches in part B1 based on the strengths and weaknesses of each one.B1CI:JUSTIFICATION OF RECOMMENDED APPROACHNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical justification of the approach recommended in B1c.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical justification, with insufficient support, of the approach recommended in B1c.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical justification, with sufficient support, of the approach recommended in B1c.C1:SEQUENCE OF STEPSNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a reasonable description of the sequence of steps that would be taken to implement the strategy.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a reasonable description, with insufficient detail, of the sequence of steps that would be taken to implement the strategy.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a reasonable accurate description, with sufficient detail, of the sequence of steps that would be taken to implement the strategy.C2:APPROACH FOR MEASURING INTENDED CHANGENOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide an appropriate description of an approach for measuring whether the intended change is occurring.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides an appropriate description, with insufficient detail, of an approach for measuring whether the intended change is occurring.COMPETENTThe candidate provides an appropriate description, with sufficient detail, of an approach for measuring whether the intended change is occurring.C3:CHALLENGES TO SUSTAINING CHANGENOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the challenges to sustaining the change once the strategy is initiated.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient detail, of the challenges to sustaining the change once the strategy is initiated.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of the challenges to sustaining the change once the strategy is initiated.C3A:APPROACHES FOR OVERCOMING CHALLENGESNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide an appropriate description of 2 approaches for overcoming these challenges and sustaining the change.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides an appropriate description, with insufficient detail, of 2 approaches for overcoming these challenges and sustaining the change.COMPETENTThe candidate provides an appropriate description, with sufficient detail, of 2 approaches for overcoming these challenges and sustaining the change.D:SOURCESNOT EVIDENTWhen the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text citations and references.APPROACHING COMPETENCEWhen the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with major deviations from APA style.COMPETENTWhen the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references accurately or with only minor deviations from APA style.