WEEK_5_discusion.docx

Read Chapter 14 in Alligood (2022).  Orem states there is a need for a nursing language that is enabling for thinking nursing and articulating with other disciplines and for communicating nursing to others in nursing practice situations.
Describe what you think it means to “think nursing?” 
Give an example of nursing language and describe how it is effective for nursing communication. 
What barriers have you experienced in communicating nursing to others?  
Read Chapter 15 in Alligood (2022).    King discusses the goal setting process.
Share a clinical experience where goal setting was or would have been helpful. 
What consequences did you experience because of missed goals? 
What level of insistence can a nurse use for pursuit of a goal? 
Reference in APA format and use NARRATIVE FORM. PLEASE USE RUBIC
Reference
Alligood, M.R. (2022). Nursing theorists and their work (10th ed.).  Elsevier.

NUR – 600Discussion Forum Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Quality of First Post

50 pts – Full Credit
Information clearly relates to the main topic and adds new concepts, information, it includes several supporting details and/or examples

25 pts – Partial Credit
Information relates to the main topic, but lacking detail, depth, and/or examples

0 pts – No Credit
Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic or simply restates the main concept without supporting details/examples

Professional Language and Writing

5 pts – Full Credit
Professional vocabulary, correct grammar, and correct spelling are consistently used throughout the discussion

2 pts – Partial Credit
Three or less errors in professional vocabulary, grammar and spelling are identified in the discussion post

0 pts – No Credit
Four of more errors in professional vocabulary, grammar and spelling are identified in the discussion post

APA Format

10 pts – Full Credit
Correct APA format consistently used throughout discussion posts

5 pts – Partial Credit
No more than two errors in APA format are identified in the discussion posts

0 pts – No Credit
Three or more errors in APA format are identified within the discussion posts or no reference list is provided

Quality of Second Post

30 pts – Full Credit
Information clearly relates to the main topic (original students post) and adds new concepts, information, and includes several supporting details and/or examples

15 pts – Partial Credit
Information relates to the main topic (original students post) but lacking detail, depth, and/or examples

0 pts – No Credit
Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic (original students post) or simply restates the main concept without supporting details/examples

Professional Language and Writing

5 pts – Full Credit
Professional vocabulary, correct grammar, and correct spelling are consistently used when commenting on another student’s response

2 pts – Partial Credit
Professional vocabulary, correct grammar, and correct spelling are consistently used when commenting on another student’s response

0 pts – No Credit
Four or more errors in professional vocabulary, grammar and spelling are identified when commenting on another student’s response

Timeliness

0 pts – Full Credit

0 pts – Partial Credit

0 pts – No Credit

Total Points: 100