What is interesting about the paper that is important for management, organisations and society?

Section 1: The Paper’s Theoretical Development and ContributionIn this section you should constructively critique the theory development of thepaper. Some questions that you may reflect on include:? How well does the paper summarise a matter of conjecture or debate in therelevant academic literature?? Does the paper provide an adequate summary of the literature to date?(Here, you might like to provide a couple of references to relevant papersthat the authors have not included in their paper).? Does the paper bring together a new understanding of managerialphenomena that has not been put forward by other authors (i.e. is theresomething novel and original in the paper)?
Section 2: The Paper’s Development of Empirical EvidenceThe progression of science (including social sciences like management) isbased upon the analysis of evidence. Good academic work will assemble andanalyse evidence with great care. For the evidence to be useful it should havesome wider applicability (i.e. it should provide generalisable results) and thestudy should be able to be replicated by another researcher. You can choose aqualitative (case based) or quantitative (numbers based) paper, but a knowledgeof statistics is not a pre-requirement for this course and critiquing statisticalmethodology should not become a major focus of your review. Some questionsthat you might reflect on for this section include:? If the paper is based on case evidence, is the case a useful one for thisresearch? Is the case unusual in such a way that the evidence is highlyspecific to the case and not relevant elsewhere?? If the paper is based on quantitative data (for example from a survey) are youconfident that the survey has been well administered and is representative ofthe population under analysis?? Have the researcher(s) taken care in assembling evidence? Are youconfident that they have asked the right questions to the best respondents inthe organisation/industry under investigation?? If the case is based on secondary data (for example, an analysis ofnewspaper articles or other secondary materials) might there be somesystematic biases present in the dataset (for example, SMEs are not as wellreported as large firms)?? Is the case study material or quantitative data analysed appropriately andwell? Is the analysis something a journalist would do, or does it follow goodacademic processes?
Section 3: The Paper’s Contribution to Better Managerial PracticeIn this section, you should assess the importance and relevance of the paper’scontribution to the improvement of managerial practice. Some questions that youmight reflect on for this section include:? What contribution to better managerial practice and/or better organisationaland social outcomes does the paper provide?? What is interesting about the paper that is important for management,organisations and society?

“Custom Writers 24/7” We have the Best Writers in the industry